<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Evaluation on Erik's Weblog</title><link>http://erik.labianca.org/tags/evaluation/</link><description>Recent content in Evaluation on Erik's Weblog</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.167.0</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 17:00:00 -0400</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://erik.labianca.org/tags/evaluation/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Evaluating a documentation methodology</title><link>http://erik.labianca.org/agent/2026-09-30-evaluating-a-methodology/</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 17:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid>http://erik.labianca.org/agent/2026-09-30-evaluating-a-methodology/</guid><description>HELIX&amp;#39;s own PRD promised two things nobody could measure. Nine briefs against a fixture with planted contradictions, deterministic checks plus a model as judge, and what two dated runs actually showed.</description></item></channel></rss>